Generative AI is a type of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that uses machine learning (ML) to produce new content from an extensive training dataset. Some platforms you may have heard of include ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, or Google's Gemini. Because it's main purpose is to generate content, it's important to be mindful of whether its application is appropriate for a specific academic setting.
| GOOD FOR | NOT GOOD FOR |
| Summarizing | Critiquing |
| Brainstorming or generating ideas | Judging |
| Outlining | Ethical choices |
| Shallow analysis | Understanding social interaction |
Using generative AI tools is very tempting for projects that take time, deep thinking, and may require skills you're still developing. If you aren't sure how to get started, using a tool to do the task for you can feel like a win for getting it done. However, be mindful when using generative AI that you're not using it to replace the learning elements of your assignments. If you aren't sure how to find sources, talk to a librarian!
Some issues with generative AI include:
So, you checked the class policy and have found that generative AI is allowed if it's cited. How to cite it is handled differently based on what formatting style guide you're using. Check with the accepted style for your class to see how to handle it based on the style guide you're using for an assignment:
Appropriate formatting is also evolving and you may want to check back frequently!
Attribution is a less formal approach for crediting ideas and material from others. In scholarly writing and presentation the exact form attribution takes varies by discipline. A widespread example is the inclusion of an acknowledgements section or slide. Attribution can also include information beyond the direct citation, including licensing information, multiple hyperlinks, and a detailed description of how and why the material is being attributed in the work. With the current state of generative artificial intelligence systems, direct citation may not fit a specific use case, and attribution offers a path to transparent disclosure across academic or research work.
The Artificial Intelligence Disclosure (AID) Framework (2024) was developed by Kari D. Weaver, Learning, Teaching, and Instructional Design Librarian, to enhance transparency and consistency in attribution practices for generative artificial intelligence. Inquiries may be directed to kari.weaver@ocul.on.ca.
This resource is an adaptation of the Artificial Intelligence Disclosure (AID) Framework (2024) by Dr. Kari D. Weaver, University of Waterloo Libraries. It has been produced as allowed under its assigned CC-BY-SA 4.0 license.
The purpose of the Artificial Intelligence Disclosure (AID) Framework is to provide brief, targeted disclosure about the use of AI systems based on the range of activities used for research writing. The AID Statement is appended to the end of the paper (similar to an Acknowledgements section), detailing the AI tools used and the manner in which they were used, based on the possible points of engagement through the writing process, as captured in the headings. The formatting is intended to be both human- and machine-readable, and uses the following structure:
Each heading: statement pair will end in a semi-colon, except for the last statement, which will end in a period. Any other symbols can be used in the "statement" portion of the heading: statement pair except for colons and semi-colons.
If AI tools were used at any point in the writing, research, or project management processes, the AID Statement will always begin with the "artificial intelligence tool" section. It will then by followed by any heading: statement pairs necessary to disclose AI tool use. Heading: statement pairs will only be included if AI was used in that portion of the writing process. If a heading is not needed, it should not be included. If AI was not used at any point in the writing, research, or project management processes, authors would not include an AID Statement in their work.
The potential headings for the AID Statement, and their definitions, are the following:
Artificial Intelligence Tool: Microsoft Copilot (Central Washington University instance); Conceptualization: Microsoft Copilot was used to revise and refine the central research question; Data Collection Methods: Microsoft Copilot was use to draft the first version of the survey instrument; Data Analysis: Microsoft Copilot was used to identify themes as themes coded from collected survey responses; Visualization: I used Microsoft Copilot to generate a line chart comparing information gathered over time; Writing - Review and Editing: Microsoft Copilot was used to help break down my results and discussion sections into smaller paragraphs; Project Administration: I used Microsoft Copilot to create a research and project submission timeline and list of tasks for the project.
Artificial Intelligence Tool: ChatGPT v.40 and Google Gemini 3; Methodology; ChatGPT was used to aid in study design and revise study structure; Information Collection; I used Google Gemini to collect relevant journal articles and other resources; Interpretation: Google Gemini 3 was used to explain the some research concepts related to Freudian theory; Writing - Review and Editing: Paper manuscript was reviewed by Google Gemini 3 for conciseness and clarity.